Wednesday, May 22nd

Last update02:50:41 PM GMT

You are here: Pak-India Monitor Peace & Conflict Archive

Peace & Conflict Archive

India-Pakistan Parliamentarians Dialogue - Joint Statement

pildatAugust 18-19, 2011
New Delhi, India

The Parliamentarians from India and Pakistan met in New Delhi on August 18-19, 2011 in their second round of the India-Pakistan Parliamentarians Dialogue. They were in complete agreement that it is in the joint and respective interest of both countries that peace, security and stability be established between the two countries.

To this end, Parliamentarians from Pakistan and India noted with considerable satisfaction that in the past seven months since the first session of the Parliamentarians Dialogue in Islamabad in January 2011, the intergovernmental dialogue has been resumed.

Noting further that Foreign Minister of Pakistan, Hina Rabbani Khar, stated at the end of the dialogue in New Delhi with her Indian counterpart, Indian External Affairs Minister, S. M. Krishna, that the dialogue between the two countries should be "un-interrupted and un-interruptible." The Parliamentarians attending the second round of India-Pakistan Parliamentarians Dialogue requested the Indian and Pakistani Co Chairs of the Dialogue to suitably convey to their respective Governments the following suggestion for further consideration and action:

1. The Parliamentarians stress the imperative of consolidating the outcome of the Composite Dialogue, which has been taking place over the last 14 years in to further agreements and to continue forward in an uninterrupted and uninterruptible manner.

2. While recognizing that some progress has been made in the formal processes of the Dialogue, the Parliamentarians recognize that peace, security and development require the resolution of outstanding issues. It is of the highest importance that the progress made so far be consolidated by urgently addressing, through the dialogue, all outstanding issues including Jammu and Kashmir, Siachen and Sir Creek as also the challenge of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations including the follow-up of 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attacks.

3. As there are wide spread concerns in Pakistan about the persistence of water problems relating to the flow of water during sowing season and timely sharing of information in the Indus Basin, the Parliamentarians urge upon both Governments that such concerns be addressed within the framework of the Indus Waters Treaty 1960. The Treaty has stood the test of time. The Parliamentarians urged upon both the Governments that it be complied with in letter and spirit and the problems and the concerns in Pakistan be addressed to ensure the continuation of a cooperative joint approach to the resolution of these concerns.

4. The Parliamentarians agreed to discuss among themselves issues related to energy security, including the proposed Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline, and urge their Governments to do likewise.

5. Economic ties, related to both trade and investment, should be boosted through the easing or removal of restrictions and considerations of a preferential duty regime.

6. People to people contact were recognized as the single most important confidence building measure. In this regard following specific recommendations were made by Parliamentarians:

1. Implementation of agreements to open new transit routes across the Line of Control in Kashmir and at Khokhrapar-Monabao, as also commencing additional flights.
2. Easing travel restrictions is of the utmost importance and visa regimes to be implemented keeping in perspective those extended to friendly countries. The Parliamentarians believed that early action should be taken bilaterally to introduce various categories such as "trusted visitors programmes" to include categories such as elected representatives, senior citizens, business persons, cultural and sports personalities, accredited journalists, former diplomats and various categories of students and researchers. Where feasible, multiple entry, 10-year, no-city restrictions and no police reporting should be urgently pursued.
3. In order to promote friendly exchanges, cultural events should be encouraged through the removal of remaining restrictions on music and cinema and the showing of television programmes should be allowed in both the countries beginning with entertainment channels.
4. To promote further friendly exchanges, it was also recommended that sporting contacts involving not only major but minor sports should be encouraged.
5. International roaming facility on mobile telephony should be available bilaterally. Pakistan and India should also be connected via optic fiber link.
6. A Parliamentary Committee on both sides should be set-up to undertake issues relating to prisoners and fishermen.

7. To lead dialogue deliberations to fruitition, the participating Parliamentarians agreed that following steps should be taken in both countries:

1. Transmission of the outcome of the dialogue to the Presiding Officers of the Parliaments in the two countries.
2. Participating Parliamentarians to brief Governments on two sides.
3. Raising and resolution of relevant issues through the respective Houses and Standing Committees of both Parliaments.
4. To promote constituency of Peace in the two countries, participating Parliamentarians, instead of highlighting differences and carrying on negative stereotypes of each other in the media, would focus on building bridges to move forward with dialogue, understanding and trust.
8. The Parliamentarians were of the view that the bilateral dialogue might also address matters of common regional concerns.
9. The Parliamentarians resolved to continue the Dialogue.

Article Alert: Indo-Pak Intelligence Cooperation

Asad Durrani and Amarjeet Singh Dulat

Post-9/11 and post-26/11 Mumbai, one would think that exchange of intelligence information among friendly agencies was occurring as a matter of course—to help fill information gaps, to verify sources and substance, and to get a ‘second opinion.’ However, as any report on intelligence reform or failures shows, the absence of coordination, even among their own agencies, remains problematic. Those in the business know why it is so rare. Intelligence agencies are possessive of turf and sources. They are reluctant to part with potentially valuable leads. Very often, though, doubt about the quality or veracity of information deters an agency from sharing it, to avoid embarrassment. Intelligence cooperation is an exception.

However, despite the valid questions, doubts and apprehensions, one can also envision conditions when such cooperation is thinkable. When countries are faced with common external or internal threats, exchange of mutually beneficial information not only might be thinkable but also desirable, even prudent.

Intelligence services could provide an ideal back channel to pave the way for political dialogue—with the added advantage of discretion and deniability. It cannot harm anyone and may even help. If the governments concerned are not in a position to embark upon a “peace process” due to political constraints, they may ask their premier agencies to establish links. (In rare cases, the agencies may even do so on their own initiative.) By the time, the environment has become favourable for the dialogue to be brought out of the basement; the secret channel would have prepared necessary ground, identified contacts, and may even recommend an out of the box approach. If war is not a serious option, then dialogue—away from the public glare and therefore under less pressure—makes plenty of sense.

Cooperation can also help to guard against panic reactions; for example, unintended mobilisation of forces or possible nuclear alerts. Some intra- or extra- regional forces could cause crises that might spin out of control, with possible nuclear consequences. While the nuclear bogey should not be exaggerated, for these and other reasons it is advisable to establish a preventive mechanism; intelligence cooperation indeed being its lynchpin. Even in the worst days of the Cold War, the CIA and KGB never ceased contacts, even through open declared officers in each other’s capitals.

Read more...

“The Mohali exchange did not take place in a policy vacuum”

Raza Rumi
– Sherry Rehman, Parlimentarian, President Jinnah Institute


The Friday Times: It was the first major interaction at this level since the Mumbai terror attacks. How was the reception? What did the Pakistani delegates and their Indian hosts talk about?

Sherry Rehman: As encounters between India and Pakistan go, this was certainly important, if only for the reason that it broke some serious ice, hitched as it was to a major public event. It was a landmark interaction after the Mumbai explosion had severely damaged bilateral relations, and it represented a clear investment in statesmanship on both sides. Pakistan and India have often relied on sideline moments at multilateral events to keep some interaction going, but this was obviously much bigger than that as ‘event diplomacy’ goes, because it involved no other players, as well as the fact that it worked with larger numbers of formal interlocutors.

Read more...

Pakistan, India want to normalise relations: Rao

Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao speaks with CNBC TV 18’s Karan Thapar about Pakistan-India relations. Here are the excerpts of the interview:

Interviewer (Shri Karan Thapar): Hello and welcome to India Tonight. Have Indo-Pakistan relations turned a page and opened a new chapter, or is that the triumph of euphoria and sentiment over substance? That in a sense is the key issue I shall explore today with the Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao.

Mrs Rao, I want to quote to you something that you said after the two Prime Ministers had met at Mohali. According to The Hindu you said, “This is reengagement. It is about peace, it is about healing wounds, it is about reconciliation. It is a good augury for the future”. Those are not just positive but very strong words. What do you say to critics who say you may be over-egging the pudding?

Read more...

Joint Statement: PM Gilani and PM Manmohan Singh

sharmelsheikhSharm el Sheikh, July 16, 2009: The Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh and the Prime Minister of Pakistan Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani met in Sharm el Sheikh on July 16, 2009.

The two Prime Ministers had a cordial and constructive meeting. They considered the entire gamut of bilateral relations with a view to charting the way forward in India - Pakistan relations.

Both leaders agreed that terrorism is the main threat to both countries. Both leaders affirmed their resolve to fight terrorism and to cooperate with each other to this end.

Read more...

Page 1 of 3

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »